Talk:Release

I started this page with the idea that it would allow linking, but I'm having trouble seeing the value of strictly copying the OOO release notes. On the other hand, there were some (minor) releases that went undocumented, and not all their releases have an anchor that can be linked to directly.

It will be interesting to see how this evolves. 18:18, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The value in the OOO release notes is that they are comprehensive, but don't really categorize the changes. Perhaps the value-add on this page would be to select the 'major' changes in each release, and add the appropriate links to the articles about them. --141.157.240.38 17:03, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * The problem I see with this is that Release Notes are in a way a publication. It's not something that's meant to undergo mass editing by anyone & their brother.  I'd advocate getting diff's to OOO to add anchors to all release notes on their site and referencing them that way.  Then a page for Release notes or somesuch term could have a description of what that means and a link to the overall release notes page on OOO. --Guppymomma 17:46, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * *smiles* I actually submitted anchor patches to liz already. Waiting on reply. 20:39, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Sadness. New release, no new anchors in Release Notes page 15:27, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

(from Talk:Main Page) It would not be too painful (and possibly quite helpful when talking about history and changes to things) to have the release notes be brought into the wiki. I would suggest the names be done as they are in the release notes page: Cry Havoc and let slip the bug fixing!, Bugs! What are they good for?, and Treasure Drop, Fair Booty Shares, Crew Dormancy for how to name them. --Shagie 02:27, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Please comment about this topic at Talk:Release --Guppymomma 02:42, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Won't this page get rather large rather quickly? --Shagie 02:27, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)